|
Gene White
Tooele County Commissioner
Gene White was elected to the Tooele County Commission in November
2000. His race against incumbent Commissioner Gary Griffith was
viewed by many Tooele residents as a referendum, of sorts, on
the issue of nuclear waste storage in the County. Gene White had
expressed serious concerns about the County entering into an agreement
with Private Fuel Storage, while Griffith had signed the agreement
and supported the financial arrangement.
The interview was conducted by program Producer Ken Verdoia in
White's Tooele home.
Ken Verdoia: Commissioner, let's go back to square one
because you tell a fascinating story of how you even found out
that such an agreement between Tooele County and PFS was being
considered. Can you tell that story just in the same context?
Gene White: Well, I was attending a regular commission
meeting and apparently the item to consider the contract had been
added to the agenda, which made the newspaper, but was not on
the copy of the agenda that I had received. And it was taken care
of at the end of the meeting in kind of a matter of fact notion,
and most of the people who would normally attend a commission
meeting had dwindled away and went home and so there were very
few of us. Only some diehards left at that particular point, and
then it was addressed with the group that was left as an item
on the agenda to approve this contract.
Verdoia: What was your reaction when you learned that?
White: I thought, "My goodness, what has happened
here?" I was just really kind of aghast because I thought
such a thing of that nature, done in such a matter of fact way,
and such a low key way without having the public's opportunity
to really be involved in it was of great concern to me at that
point.
Verdoia: We've talked with more then a dozen individuals
that say, "I voted for Gene White because he was as concerned
about PFS as I am." It may have been in fact a pivotal factor
in your election. Do you share that sentiment?
White: Well, that's a possibility with it. I believe that
it may have playing into it but I think that the public was concerned
about several issues that they felt left out of. And that may
have been the straw that said you know, "We've been concerned
about some things being done that we didn't feel like we had input
into and now they've done this." Maybe was a more significant
thing in that way.
Verdoia: Public input. Philosophically, how do you come
down this issue of listening to the voice of the public when it
comes to a major county undertaking?
White: I think that it's of the utmost importance. I served
12 years on the board of education before I was elected to this
position and even though we represented at that point certain
precincts, I felt that we did very well at listening to where
the needs of the district were and not just the precinct that
I represented. And I think that's a critical to any public services
to serve the majority of the people in, in the best way that we
can.
Verdoia: Once you had an opportunity to review the contract,
were your fears put at ease?
White: Well. I was concerned because I felt that there
were certain things written into the contract that obligated the
county to certain things that may have enhanced PFS to move forward
in their licensing that they may have not otherwise been able
to do with issues on public safety and public health that needed
to be addressed with county officials.
Verdoia:Were some corners cut?
White: Well, that's hard to say. Again, just in looking
at the contract and the way it was negotiated, may have helped
PFS move forward and they may not otherwise been able to do.
Verdoia: I'm going to phrase this very carefully. You
made reference to a clause in that contract, and I'm not asking
you to tell me whether that clause is right or wrong, but a clause
that restricts the ability of county commissioners to give voice
to certain sentiment. Can you tell me what that clause means?
White:Well, the way I interpreted that clause was those
commissioners who were signatory to that contract were obligated
to not say anything negative towards PFS and their ability to
move forward in their licensing procedure.
Verdoia: Literally, once they signed, there could be no
more public complaint.
White: There maybe public complaint, but those officials
in their capacity as commissioners would not be free to do anything
that might restrict or hinder PFS from moving forward in their
license with the NRC.
Next |